There has been much confusion around the new 3D format among not just consumers, but also industry members. What do I need in order to demonstrate it to customers? And in turn, what do customers need to buy to get it at home?
Last week, I wrote a blog entry that covered the 10 Most Common Misconceptions about 3D. One point I confirmed is that you do require all new equipment, including a 3D-ready display, 3D-ready source player, and, if you have an A/V receiver in the setup, a model that supports the new HDMI 1.4 specification. Indeed, all of these are correct. However, two specific areas of contention lie with the cables and the receiver.
On the first point, do you need actual wire that supports HDMI 1.4? Or can existing "HDMI 1.3 cables" work just fine? According to spokespersons from HDMI Licensing, LLC, a previously-purchased HDMI cable should actually work just fine, provided it's labeled as "high-speed".
"There were two categories of cables before 1.4 was released," confirms the organization's representative. "Standard HDMI Cable and High Speed HDMI Cable. A 1.3 cable can mean either a Standard HDMI cable or High Speed HDMI cable. Since 1.4 was released, HDMI cables can no longer use the version numbers to market their products. As long as the cable is High Speed, the cable is capable of carrying the full 1080p 3D signals."
This means that what consumers (and retailers) need to look at is the speed rating, not the seemingly arbitrary specification number.
"As long as the cable the consumer owns is High Speed," she reiterates, "even if it is labeled as an ‘HDMI 1.3 High Speed' cable, the cable is capable of carrying the full 1080p 3D signals to a 3D-ready TV and 3D-ready Blu-ray player."
To the second point, what about an A/V receiver? Can a 3D signal be passed through one that doesn't boast HDMI 1.4? According to the HDMI Licensing spokesperson, it "may or may not pass through an AVR that's not built to the 1.4 spec, unless the AVR has a firmware upgrade."
That upgrade, however, is "a business decision by the AVR manufacturers whether and when to perform," she adds.
Note that regardless of whether you manage to pass a 3D signal through an A/V receiver built upon the 1.3 spec or not, all other products in the equation, like the display and the source player, most definitely must support HDMI 1.4, and thus 3D.
The news is bittersweet. On the one hand, this mean the lucrative add-on cable sale might not be necessary to allow customers to get 3D. But on the other hand, if you've already sold the client a brand spanking new home theatre system, complete with firmware upgradeable A/V receiver, this might just mean two fewer items you have to advise him to buy.




Connect with Facebook


Subscribe to Blog













5 comments »
fatcow March 19, 2010, 23:33 pm
I agree with Ken S. What's considered as "standard speed" and "high speed" today will become "low speed" and "standard speed" of tomorrow and will become "very low speed" and "low speed" of the day after. Instead of making so many different versions of HDMI 1.4 cables, as a standard-body HDMI organization should just set one standard HDMI 1.4 which HAS to be "high-speed", ARC, and Ethernet compatible. The design and manufacturing cost between the cables are literally pennies (and for certain features, are a fraction of a penny). I know that because I've designed a full HDMI 1.4 3D/ARC/Ethernet/In-wall cable and the cost difference is next to nothing. HDMI organisation is merely giving a "license to mark up" by differentiating cables with high-speed/3D, ARC, Ethernet.
Stretch March 19, 2010, 21:22 pm
Christine, I for one was confused and appreciate the clarification. While I applaud the organization's recent decision to not allow version numbers on the cables, I'm not sure things are made any more clear with "relative" terms such as "Standard Speed" or "High Speed". A cable that may be high speed today, will invariably be slow speed a few years from now. I don't think there are enough adjectives for the ever increasing speeds of the cables (although Monster is trying with their High, Ultra-High and Ultimate-High; what do you call it after Ultimate-High?!) Perhaps they should just stick with the speed rating (Gbps) and then say, "to be able to achieve these features, you need a cable capable of x Gbps".
fatcow March 17, 2010, 19:31 pm
Just as an additional info, SOME (but not all) HDMI 1.3 cables are actually already manufactured as per HDMI 1.4 spec for ARC (Audio Return Channel) and Ethernet. Monster Cables HD1000 series is one of them (no, I don't work for Monster Cables and it is not an endorsement of any kind, just stating the fact based on my personal findings)
ChristinePersaud March 16, 2010, 18:07 pm
Hi fatcow, While I appreciate your level of knowledge on the topic, many of our readers are confused about the issue, hence the reason for posting this clarification. And while the HDMI Website does explain the updates in the new 1.4 specification, it does not confirm that cables that may have been released with a previous specification can indeed work with 3D content provided they're ultra-speed. Many were under the impression that you'd have to buy a whole new set of cables.
fatcow March 16, 2010, 17:51 pm
a quick visit to hdmi.org will show this information since November 2009 when I designed the HDMI 1.4 compliant cable. Come on, Marketnews, come up with news and not old informations!
Leave a comment
Add your comment below
Please Note: by adding your comments you signify that you agree to the terms of our Code of Conduct.
You must be logged in to leave a comment. Log in | Sign up