ads
Canada Night 2010


FEATURE: Point, Counter-Point - 'LED TV' vs. 'LCD TV'

Christine Persaud

Published: 03/30/2010 08:30:04 AM UTC in Features

5 comments

There's no denying that LED-backlit LCD TVs are LCD TVs that contain LEDs as a source of backlighting instead of traditional CCFL bulbs. But when it comes to introducing the technology at the retail level, the issue can lend to a lot of customer confusion. For one, if you call it an LED-backlit LCD, the customers' eyes will likely glaze over. But if you call it an LED TV, aren't you misinforming him? After all, the only truly "LED" TVs on the market are ones like that 11" Sony OLED beauty that was introduced a few years back. Right?

Some would say it's all semantics, but judging from the industry debate, it's clear that whether you agree with one side or the other, it's an issue that requires addressing.

"LED TVs"
If features like slim form factor, energy savings, and better picture quality, can't be achieved using traditional TFT LCD technologies, than how can we possibly use the same name? And if light source has nothing to do with naming a flat panel, why do we call a plasma a plasma?

Then again, the difference between TFT-LCDs with CCFL backlights and LCDs with LED backlights is significant enough that consumers need to understand the benefits. In this respect, you're selling yourself short by selling these flat panels simply as LCDs.

According to Robert Gumiela, Director of Marketing for CE at Samsung Electronics of Canada Inc., there is a bevy of differences between LCD and "LED" that warrant dropping the LCD moniker.

"What has four wheels, a steering wheel, and an engine?" he asks, showing us a diagram of a golf cart, a tractor, and a Maserati. "It would be rather interesting playing eighteen holes using a Maserati, cruising the Autobahn on a tractor, or plowing fields with a golf cart. They share a commonality of being vehicles and providing transportation, but their differences outweigh their similarities."

He moves on to his next example. This time, the photo depicts a calculator, a wristwatch, and a clock radio. "They are all true liquid crystal displays," he says, "but it would be quite interesting using them to watch TSN in HD. What we know as an LCD TV is really a TFT-CCFL liquid crystal display device that combines a variety of technologies to product a high-definition video image."

Analogies are great, but Gumiela cites eight points that he feels really bring his position home.

 

  • LED is a solid state semi-conductor opposed to a CCFL which uses a fluorescent lamp to produce light;
  • LED light is significantly faster in rise and decay time which results in better contrast ratios and better motion performance;
  • The liquid crystal substrate is modified to account for faster LED response time. (Sure, there is a substrate that contains liquid crystals, but you have to have a thin film transistor layer to actually control them. And because LED performs differently, that TFT is different.);
  • The LED light path uses a number of substrate elements (light plates, prisms) which is distinctly different to a conventional CCFL ;
  • The LED colour gamut (typically 105% of HD colour gamut) is distinctly different to a conventional CCFL;
  • LED panel substrates utilize enhanced polarization films;
  • LED utilizes significantly less power than conventional CCFL;
  • LED light technology contributes to a remarkably different mechanical or cosmetic design.

 

While Samsung is a big proponent on this front, the Korean manufacturer is not alone in its stance. Listen to any Bay Bloor Radio radio ad and you'll note that the downtown Toronto retailer clearly distinguishes among plasma, LCD, and LED TVs.

According to Richard Bowden, the retailer's Director of Sales, customers find it easier to understand the situation this way. "Category One: Plasma. Category 2: LCD (we explain the basics; the rear-mounted fluorescent tubes, etc.) Category Three: LED. (we explain the sub-categories of full array and edge lit).

"To clients," he continues, "they seem to want to know which is the newest technology, which is most energy efficient, and of course which is the thinnest. At the end of the day, there is a lot of LCD, LED, ABC going around. Of course the most important thing is to reinforce that most premium brands are exiting the LCD label and moving to LED."

However, Bowden does admit that the TVs are discussed as somewhere along the lines of the next-generation LCD TVs, which means the three-letters aren't completely lost in translation.

To the counter-points noted in the opposite section, Gumiela muses: "I'm still trying to watch the hockey game on my LCD clock radio. I tried changing the back light, but to no avail."

Samsung Canada's Robert Gumiela poses proudly in front of a series of complex diagrams and calculations that he feels justify why LCD TVs with LED backlighting should be called LED TVs.


Article Tags:  light, different, category, gumiela, technology, plasma, backlit, points, displays, differences, customers, liquid, panel, thompson, backlighting, canada, technologies, substrate, customer, crystal, radio, samsung, gamut, marketing, conventional, models,

x

FEATURE: Point, Counter-Point - 'LED TV' vs. 'LCD TV'








(To send to multiple recipients, please insert a semi-colon ";" in between addresses)





5 comments »


Avatar

Mergatroid April 09, 2010, 21:54 pm

I agree with the posters here. I have seen this discussion over and over on various tech sites. The basic fact of the matter is a "CRT" TV is one that uses a CRT to produce a picture. A Plasma TV is one that uses Plasma in conjunction with phosphor to produce a picture (A better name for these TVs might have been a Plasma Tube, but many people refer to them as "Plasma Panels" which is fine). An LCD TV is one which uses LCDs to product a picture. Are we noticing a pattern here? An LED TV would be one which uses LEDs to produce a picture. Are these latest LED TVs using LEDs to produce a picture? No, they use the same LCDs as the CCFL backlit TVs use. So, we can see that the LED backlit TVs should have another name as mentioned in the comments above. When actual LED TVs become available what will they be called now that a few companies have stolen the name to confuse consumers? Sure, they could be called OLED TVs, but that's assuming OLED will be the only type of LED TV on the market. Whoever thought of using the name LED TV for backlit LCD TVs should just take his foot out of his mouth and admit they made an error. Now there is a company in the USA who has made a white piece of flat plastic rather like a piece of paper. These sheets could also be used to backlight an LCD TV. What would we call those? Glowing flat plastic TVs? No, they would still be LCD TVs.

Avatar

Frank Lenk April 01, 2010, 04:58 am

IF we'd called earlier-generation TVs "CCFLs" then it MIGHT make sense to call the new ones "LEDs." But that didn't happen. If there's a need for a catchier name than "LED-backlit LCD," go ahead and invent one. Call the new screens "Super-LCD." Or "LCD-Plus." Or "Super-Dynamic Wham-o Vision." But it's WAY too late to call them "LED."

Avatar

fatcow March 31, 2010, 03:36 am

•LED is a solid state semi-conductor opposed to a CCFL which uses a fluorescent lamp to produce light; -- so? that means it's LED backlit LCD vs CCFL backlit LCD •LED light is significantly faster in rise and decay time which results in better contrast ratios and better motion performance; -- it's only referring on the backlight technology, not the LCD itself •The liquid crystal substrate is modified to account for faster LED response time. (Sure, there is a substrate that contains liquid crystals, but you have to have a thin film transistor layer to actually control them. And because LED performs differently, that TFT is different.); -- even Samsung admit that it's modified-LCD... so it's still LCD •The LED light path uses a number of substrate elements (light plates, prisms) which is distinctly different to a conventional CCFL ; -- again, going back to the backlighting technology, not the LCD itself •The LED colour gamut (typically 105% of HD colour gamut) is distinctly different to a conventional CCFL; -- being 105% of HD colour gamut is utterly pointless if the RGBCMY points can't be on-point as per D65 colour temp mapping. •LED panel substrates utilize enhanced polarization films; -- still talking about the backlight technology here... can we talk about something else? •LED utilizes significantly less power than conventional CCFL; -- so? still doesn't make it LED TV, still and LCD TV !!! •LED light technology contributes to a remarkably different mechanical or cosmetic design. -- huh? is this even an argument? contributing a different mechanical and cosmetic design are legitimate reasons to call it "LED TVs" my goodness, stay with marketing, don't try to legitimize the thing that is already considered illegal BY LAW in UK. You've lost the battle there, that means no matter how much you want to spin it... it's still LCD!! Kudos to Sharp for being honest and truly stick to the engineering and technical facts as opposed to Samsung's failed (and illegal in the UK) marketing spin... err, I mean marketing scheme.

Avatar

fatcow March 30, 2010, 23:05 pm

Calling an LED backlit LCD as LED TV is misleading. It's so misleading, in fact, in the United Kingdom, the government makes it ILLEGAL to call "LED-backlit LCD" as "LED TV" The sad part is that in the UK, the first company that UK government attacked was Samsung.

Avatar

Paul E. March 30, 2010, 18:46 pm

You could've thrown in the mix Sharp's 4 colour filter system as well

Leave a comment

Add your comment below

Please Note: by adding your comments you signify that you agree to the terms of our Code of Conduct.

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Log in | Sign up

Denon Celebrates 100 Years and a legacy of Firsts: Part 1 of 3

Denon Celebrates 100 Years and a legacy of Firsts: Part 1 of 3 + see more videos